NUVITRON, " - dedicated to the honor of Rudolf Diesel
*Unity of Invention - Two-in-one Device)
(The two devices complement each other)
(WE DEDICATE OUR INVENTION TO RUDOLF DIESEL, the inventor of the Diesel engine. INSTEAD OF SHAMING IT (the diesel engine; like what some Germans are doing), WE WILL UPLIFT THE DIESEL ENGINE TO ITS FORMER GLORY WHERE IT REALLY BELONG.
DIESEL ENGINE MANUFACTURERS MAY START WHERE OUR DEVICE/S GREATLY REDUCES ENGINE EMISSIONS TO LESS THAN 1 %. BELOW 1% OPACITY, THEY CAN FURTHER REDUCE THIS TO EURO 6 STANDARDS!) with simplified egr,scr, doc, dpf, etc.. for reduced costs, weight and other factors.
*Mike Brezonick (of khl): "The simplest way to solve a problem is the correct one".
*Quote : K.I.S.S. "Keep it simple, stu*** Sorry for the language
*We foresee that the NUVITRON will prevent the demise of the the diesel engine and could be a 'fix' for VW's "Dieselgate".
[[Best comment about our invention: "IT SORTS OF STRAINS CREDULITY TO THINK THAT
GLOBAL COMPANIES WOULD SPEND BILLIONS OVER THE COURSE OF THE LAST
DECADE OR TWO AND WOULD ALL COME UP WITH THE WRONG ANSWER, WHILE
INVENTORS WORKING ON THEIR OWN SOMEWHERE CAME UP WITH SOMETHING ALL
THE ENGINE COMPANIES MISSED"]]
*("Yes sir, Engr. xxxx xxxxxxxxx, the reason ALL the global companies had failed to find a simple answer to ICE emissions is that they concentrated on the 'waste side' of an engine. I still say that it is illogical to clean an engine' emissions by cleaning the waste of an engine.
Engine companies concentrated on the 'waste side ' of the engine. 'It is ILLOGICAL to clean engine waste, rather, we opted to place our devices before combustion' This is analogous to eating nutritious food and breathing clean air.]] "WASTE SIDE DEVICES: ARE VERY COMPLICATED AND VERY EXPENSIVE. It also require periodic maintenance.
Remember that the simplest way to solve a problem is the correct one)"
[Our invention consists of two separate devices. Both are electronic. One is installed on the fuel hose while the other is inside the air intake hose, after the air filter. Please note that the test engines are 10-30 years old, without turbo, common rail, egr, scr, doc and dpf. ALL emissions were below 1% (0.9 down to 0.5). If these engines were to be equipped with egr, scr, doc, dpf or any post combustion device, imagine what the emissions would be. Euro 6, perhaps?
(The results of emission tests on smoke belching engines:
Before After a few seconds(almost instantaneous)
8.4% 0.76%
7.8% 0.61%
5.4% 0.84%
Nothing was added to the diesel fuel; no fuel treatment, too.)
The device/s not only reduce emissions but could also save fuel (10-30%+) and increase engine power.
The latest test on a bus; (from 4 to 0.5) Sorry, no data posted because there is no baseline. Btw, the most common practice here is to use Adblue which is inconvenient, require periodic maintenance and expensive. Our devices are 'ikabit and forget' - install and forget.
(Note: A surplus diesel engine such as the Isuzu 4BAX; 4BEXX(10-30yo) is non-turbo, non-CRDI, without retrofit devices (which are all on the 'waste side' - (such as scr, egr, doc, dpf, etc).
Please observe that the NUVITRON device/s are connected BEFORE combustion which is analogous to eating clean food and breathing clean air. The retrofit devices which were developed in U.S.A. and Europe are on the 'waste side' of the engine.]
**Our govt (LTO) is now using the device/s to enable smoke-belching vehicles to pass the emissions tests.
Euro 4 standard is 0.5%. Our country's standard is 1.2% for diesel engines.
Contact Information: (for private comments)
Email: perlito.cabauatan@gmail.com
Comments
Post a Comment